It was not Public Relations that broke
the story about David Letterman's retirement from Late Night. All it took was a
140-character tweet on social media to break the story to the world. There was
no press release, there was no speech, and there was no reportage. A tweet is all
it took.
So
with the new trend of breaking news from social media, is there a need for
public relations? Are Public relation officers today doing the jobs of
marketing professionals? And how is public relations different from marketing?
Public relations, marketing and
advertising are all about communicating a story to the public. All three areas
are involved with getting customers, moving products and driving revenue (Chima, C. 2013). So then what sets them apart?
Wikipedia defines Public Relations as a
practice that manages the spread of information between an individual or an
organization and the public. The main objective of public relations it says is
for a company to be able to persuade the public, investor, partners, employees,
and other stakeholders to maintain a point of view about it, its leadership,
products, or of political decisions.
So with all the interchangeable roles of
marketing, public relations and advertising, experts say that the future is of integrated
marketing and public relations. Everyone should be able to do a little of everything.
For instance marketing teams should be able to buy advertisements and pitch
stories to reporters and advertising agencies should be able to whip some
compelling content.
Besides a good press release can grow
brand awareness by getting a company's name out in the market. But to get the
name out, we need to have the distribution channel that will reach out to the
target audience. And hence Marketing and PR go hand-in-hand. PR Newswire's
research shows that there's a lot of potential for PR opportunities when
content marketing is used effectively. Bylines can lead to blog posts, blog
posts to bylines, and press releases can lead to bylines and blog posts (Cohen, H., 2012).
Both marketing and public relations went
through an evolution in the twentieth century. Some business historians called
this period the teenage years for public relations and marketing. As marketing
and public relations expanded, their activities became more aggressive,
sometimes considered to be interchangeable. In his book Public Relations: Concepts and Practices, Ray Simon wrote:
"Marketing and public relations ...
both are major external functions of the firm and both share a common ground in
regard to product publicity and consumer relations. At the same time, however,
they operate on different levels and from different perspectives and
perceptions.
The traditional view ... is that
marketing exists to sense, serve, and satisfy customer needs at a profit.
Public relations exists to produce
goodwill in the company's various publics so that the publics do not interfere
in the firm's profit-making ability."
In fact majority of public relations
practitioners and marketers think alike. They say that marketing's measure of success
is the number of sales and/or the revenue it generates, whereas public
relations' measure of success is expressed public opinion or other evidence of
public support (Turney,
M., 2001)
Reference
List
Chima, C. (2013). What Is The Difference Between Public Relations And Marketing? PR
Tips for Startups. Retrieved from website link
Cohen, H. (2012). 11 Communications Experts On Marketing, PR & MarCom. Heidi
Cohen website. Retrieved from website link
Turney, M. (2001). Public relations and marketing were initially distinct. On-line
Readings in Public Relations website. Retrieved from website link
No comments:
Post a Comment